Push: software design and the cultural politics of music production

New York: Oxford University Press (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Push: Software Design and the Cultural Politics of Music Production shows how changes in the design of music software in the first decades of the twenty-first century shaped the production techniques and performance practices of artists working across media, from hip-hop and electronic dance music to video games and mobile apps. Emerging alongside developments in digital music distribution such as peer-to-peer file sharing and the MP3 format, digital audio workstations like FL Studio and Ableton Live introduced design affordances that encouraged rapid music creation workflows through flashy, "user-friendly" interfaces. Meanwhile, software such as Avid's Pro Tools attempted to protect its status as the "industry standard," "professional" DAW of choice by incorporating design elements from pre-digital music technologies. Other software, like Cycling 74's Max, asserted its alterity to "commercial" DAWs by presenting users with nothing but a blank screen. These are more than just aesthetic design choices. Push examines the social, cultural, and political values designed into music software, and how those values become embodied by musical communities through production and performance. It reveals ties between the maximalist design of FL Studio, skeuomorphic design in Pro Tools, and gender inequity in the music products industry. It connects the computational thinking required by Max, as well as iZotope's innovations in artificial intelligence, with the cultural politics of Silicon Valley's "design thinking." Finally, it thinks through what happens when software becomes hardware, and users externalize their screens through the use of MIDI controllers, mobile media, and video game controllers. Amidst the perpetual upgrade culture of music technology, Push provides a model for understanding software as a microcosm for the increasing convergence of globalization, neoliberal capitalism, and techno-utopianism that has come to define our digital lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moribund music: can classical music be saved?Carolyn Beckingham - 2009 - Portland: Sussex Academic Press.
Music.Nicholas Cook - 2010 - New York, NY: Sterling.
Musical intimacy: construction, connection, and engagement.Zack Stiegler - 2023 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Edited by Todd Campbell.
Lit-rock: literary capital in popular music.Ryan Hibbett (ed.) - 2022 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Music & meaning.Jenefer Robinson (ed.) - 1997 - Ithaca [N.Y.]: Cornell University Press.
Listening to the unconscious: adventures in popular music and psychoanalysis.Kenneth M. Smith - 2023 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Edited by Stephen Overy.
Digital signatures: the impact of digitization on popular music sound.Ragnhild Brøvig - 2016 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Edited by Anne Danielsen.
Music, meaning and media.Erkki Pekkilä, David Neumeyer & Richard Littlefield (eds.) - 2006 - Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-14

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references