Legal retrieval as support to eMediation: matching disputant’s case and court decisions

Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (1):1-22 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The perspective of online dispute resolution is to develop an online electronic system aimed at solving out-of-court disputes. Among ODR schemes, eMediation is becoming an important tool for encouraging the positive settlement of an agreement among litigants. The main motivation underlying the adoption of eMediation is the time/cost reduction for the resolution of disputes compared to the ordinary justice system. In the context of eMediation, a fundamental requirement that an ODR system should meet relates to both litigants and mediators, i.e. to enable an informed negotiation by informing the parties about the rights and duties related to the case. In order to match this requirement, we propose an information retrieval system able to retrieve relevant court decisions with respect to the disputant case description. The proposed system combines machine learning and natural language processing techniques to better match disputant case descriptions with court decisions. Experimental results confirm the ability of the proposed solution to empower court decision retrieval, enabling therefore a well-informed eMediation process.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval.Marie-Francine Moens - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.
Two examples of decision support in the law.István Borgulya - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):303-321.
The structuring of legal knowledge in Lois.Wim Peters, Maria-Teresa Sagri & Daniela Tiscornia - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2):117-135.
Legal theory, legal interpretation, and judicial review.David O. Brink - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):105-148.
Is it Easy to Remain Solely an Interpretator for a Court?Egidijus Baranauskas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 116 (2):201-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
28 (#574,240)

6 months
10 (#280,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On computable numbers with an application to the AlanTuringproblem.C. F. Huws & J. C. Finnis - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):181-203.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval.Marie-Francine Moens - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.

Add more references