The Open Past in an Indeterministic Physics

Foundations of Physics 53 (1):1-11 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussions on indeterminism in physics focus on the possibility of an open future, i.e. the possibility of having potential alternative future events, the realisation of one of which is not fully determined by the present state of affairs. Yet, can indeterminism affect also the past, making it open as well? We show that by upholding principles of finiteness of information one can entail such a possibility. We provide a toy model that shows how the past could be fundamentally indeterminate, while also explaining the intuitive (and observed) asymmetry between the past—which can be remembered, at least partially—and the future—which is impossible to fully predict.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can the world be shown to be indeterministic after all?Christian Wuthrich - 2010 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 365--389.
The open past.Ned Markosian - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (1):95 - 105.
The phenomenology and metaphysics of the open future.Derek Lam - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):3895-3921.
Determinism and Indeterminism.Charlotte Werndl - 2016 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press USA.
Real Numbers are the Hidden Variables of Classical Mechanics.Nicolas Gisin - 2020 - Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 7:197–201.
From the Sky to the Fundamental Physics.Renata Kallosh - 2018 - Foundations of Physics 48 (10):1279-1290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-27

Downloads
35 (#460,468)

6 months
16 (#163,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicolas Gisin
University of Geneva

Citations of this work

Quantum Epistemology and Constructivism.Patrick Fraser, Nuriya Nurgalieva & Lídia del Rio - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (6):1561-1574.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Time and Chance.David Z. Albert - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The propensity interpretation of probability.Karl R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):25-42.
A Probabilistic Theory of Causality.P. Suppes - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (4):409-410.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Vol 73, No 3.Karl R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (38):171-171.

View all 16 references / Add more references