Overcoming Barriers to Cross-cultural Cooperation in AI Ethics and Governance

Philosophy and Technology 33 (4):571-593 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Achieving the global benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) will require international cooperation on many areas of governance and ethical standards, while allowing for diverse cultural perspectives and priorities. There are many barriers to achieving this at present, including mistrust between cultures, and more practical challenges of coordinating across different locations. This paper focuses particularly on barriers to cooperation between Europe and North America on the one hand and East Asia on the other, as regions which currently have an outsized impact on the development of AI ethics and governance. We suggest that there is reason to be optimistic about achieving greater cross-cultural cooperation on AI ethics and governance. We argue that misunderstandings between cultures and regions play a more important role in undermining cross-cultural trust, relative to fundamental disagreements, than is often supposed. Even where fundamental differences exist, these may not necessarily prevent productive cross-cultural cooperation, for two reasons: (1) cooperation does not require achieving agreement on principles and standards for all areas of AI; and (2) it is sometimes possible to reach agreement on practical issues despite disagreement on more abstract values or principles. We believe that academia has a key role to play in promoting cross-cultural cooperation on AI ethics and governance, by building greater mutual understanding, and clarifying where different forms of agreement will be both necessary and possible. We make a number of recommendations for practical steps and initiatives, including translation and multilingual publication of key documents, researcher exchange programmes, and development of research agendas on cross-cultural topics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cross-cultural methodological issues in ethical research.Gael McDonald - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):89 - 104.
God’s punishment and public goods.Dominic D. P. Johnson - 2005 - Human Nature 16 (4):410-446.
Towards a meta ethics of culture – halfway to a theory of metanorms.M. Karmasin - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):337 - 346.
The Propositional vs. Hermeneutic Models of Cross-Cultural Understanding.Xinli Wang & Ling Xu - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):312-331.
Self Governance and Cooperation.Robert H. Myers - 1999 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-15

Downloads
40 (#401,794)

6 months
18 (#146,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jess Whittlestone
Oxford University
Yi Zeng
Chinese Academy of Science
Zhe Liu
Peking University
1 more

References found in this work

Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies.Nick Bostrom (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 17 references / Add more references