Elementary probabilistic operations: a framework for probabilistic reasoning

Thinking and Reasoning 30 (2):259-300 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The framework of elementary probabilistic operations (EPO) explains the structure of elementary probabilistic reasoning tasks as well as people’s performance on these tasks. The framework comprises three components: (a) Three types of probabilities: joint, marginal, and conditional probabilities; (b) three elementary probabilistic operations: combination, marginalization, and conditioning, and (c) quantitative inference schemas implementing the EPO. The formal part of the EPO framework is a computational level theory that provides a problem space representation and a classification of elementary probabilistic problems based on computational requirements for solving a problem. According to the EPO framework, current methods for improving probabilistic reasoning are of two kinds: First, reduction of Bayesian problems to a type of probabilistic problems requiring less conceptual and procedural competencies. Second, enhancing people’s utilization competence by fostering the application of quantitative inference schemas. The approach suggests new applications, including the teaching of probabilistic reasoning, using analogical problem solving in probabilistic reasoning, and new methods for analyzing errors in probabilistic problem solving.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Probabilistic Explanation of the Modus Ponens–Modus Tollens Asymmetry.Stephan Hartmann, Benjamin Eva & Henrik Singmann - 2019 - In Stephan Hartmann, Benjamin Eva & Henrik Singmann (eds.), CogSci 2019 Proceedings. Montreal, Québec, Kanada: pp. 289–294.
In defense of the maximum entropy inference process.J. Paris & A. Vencovská - 1997 - International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 17 (1):77-103.
Blurring Out Cosmic Puzzles.Yann Benétreau-Dupin - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):879–891.
The Argument from Silence.Timothy McGrew - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (2):215-228.
How to use probabilities in reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (1):65 - 85.
If perception is probabilistic, why doesn't it seem probabilistic?Ned Block - 2018 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 373 (1755).
Forecasting with jury-based probabilistic argumentation.Francesca Toni, Antonio Rago & Kristijonas Čyras - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3):224-243.
Quantitative Logic Reasoning.Marcelo Finger - 2018 - In Walter Carnielli & Jacek Malinowski (eds.), Contradictions, from Consistency to Inconsistency. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 241-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-24

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
8 (#373,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?