On the Embodiment of Space and Time: Triadic logic, quantum indeterminacy and the metaphysics of relativity

Abstract

Triadic (systemical) logic can provide an interpretive paradigm for understanding how quantum indeterminacy is a consequence of the formal nature of light in relativity theory. This interpretive paradigm is coherent and constitutionally open to ethical and theological interests. In this statement: (1) Triadic logic refers to a formal pattern that describes systemic (collaborative) processes involving signs that mediate between interiority (individuation) and exteriority (generalized worldview or Umwelt). It is also called systemical logic or the logic of relatives. The term "triadic logic" emphasizes that this logic involves mediation of dualities through an irreducibly triadic formalism. The term "systemical logic" emphasizes that this logic applies to systems in contrast to traditional binary logic which applies to classes. The term "logic of relatives" emphasizes that this logic is background independent (in the sense discussed by Smolin ). (2) An interpretive paradigm refers to a way of thinking that generates an understanding through concepts, their inter-relationships and their connections with experience. (3) Coherence refers to holistic integrity or continuity in the meaning of concepts that form an interpretation or understanding. (4) Constitutionally open refers to an inherent dependence in principle of an interpretation or understanding on something outside of a specific discipline's discourse or domain of inquiry (epistemic system). Interpretations that are constitutionally open are incomplete in themselves and open to responsive, interdisciplinary discourse and collaborative learning.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Peirce’s Triadic Logic Revisited.Robert Lane - 1999 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (2):284 - 311.
The New Quantum Logic.Robert B. Griffiths - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (6):610-640.
Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature?Peter Mittelstaedt - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):215-222.
On quantum logic.T. A. Brody - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (5):409-430.
The Logic of the Sacred in Bateson and Peirce.Deborah Eicher-Catt - 2003 - American Journal of Semiotics 19 (1-4):95-126.
Particles and Paradoxes: The Limits of Quantum Logic.Peter Gibbins - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Quantum Logic and Quantum Reconstruction.Allen Stairs - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (10):1351-1361.
Operational foundation of quantum logic.P. Mittelstaedt & E. W. Stachow - 1974 - Foundations of Physics 4 (3):355-365.
Primacy of Quantum Logic in the Natural World.Cynthia Sue Larson - 2015 - Cosmos and History 11 (2):326-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-08

Downloads
325 (#63,566)

6 months
89 (#54,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy M. Rogers
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leibnizian relationalism for general relativistic physics.Antonio Vassallo & Michael Esfeld - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (C):101-107.
The Architecture of Theories.Charles S. Peirce - 1891 - The Monist 1 (2):161-176.
Evolutionary love.Charles Sanders Peirce - 1893 - The Monist 3 (2):176-200.

View all 6 references / Add more references