Sign-inferences in Greek and Buddhist Logic

History and Philosophy of Logic:1-33 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Yogācāra school of logic developed a theory of sign-inferences that has many features of the Stoic and Epicurean logical teachings with small inclusions of Aristotelian ideas. In the Nyāyabindu of Dharmakīrti, we can find the following schemes of formal reasoning: modus Barbara (Figure I) and modus Camenes (Figure IV) of the Aristotelian syllogistic, and all the inference rules of the Stoic logic: modus ponens, modus tollens, modus ponendo tollens, modus tollendo ponens I, modus tollendo ponens II. The three premises of Yogācāra inference (if p, then q; there is an example that p and q occur together; p; then q) corresponds to the Epicurean doctrine of three premises with a necessary exemplification. Thus, the paper is a comparative study of Greek and Buddhist theory of sign-inferences, showing a deep similarity between them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Buddhist Philosophy of Logic1.Koji Tanaka - 2013 - In Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 320–330.
Buddhist Logic from a Global Perspective.Koji Tanaka - 2021 - In Inkeri Koskinen, David Ludwig, Zinhle Mncube, Luana Poliseli & Luis Reyes-Galindo (eds.), Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. London: Routledge. pp. 274-285.
Ancient Logic (substantive revision Dec 29, 2015).Susanne Bobzien - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
History of the mediaeval school of Indian logic.Satis Chandra Vidyabhusana - 1909 - New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp. : exclusively distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
Indian logic.Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The development of modern logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Indian logic: its problems as treated by its schools.Krishna Kumar Dixit - 1975 - Vaishali (Muzaffarpur): Research Institute of Prakrit, Jainology, and Ahimsa.
Buddhist formal logic.R. S. Y. Chi - 1969 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Form and validity in Indian logic.Vijay Bharadwaja - 1990 - Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study in association with Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, Delhi.
Introduction.Lou Goble - 2017 - In The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 1–8.
Buddhist Philosophy of Logic.Koji Tanaka - 2013 - In Emmanuel Steven Michael (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 320-330.
Mongġol u̇ndu̇su̇ten-u̇ logiq sedkiku̇i-yin sudulul: Agvandandar-un ucir siltaġan-u uqaġan.Tu̇ Ȯljei - 1997 - [Śenyang]: Liyuuning-un U̇ndu̇su̇ten-u̇ Keblel-u̇n Qoriy-a.
Logic, History of: Ancient Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-17

Downloads
18 (#839,032)

6 months
18 (#146,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Schumann
University of Information Technology and Management In Rzeszow

Citations of this work

Stoic Sign-Inference and Their Lore of Fate.Andrew Schumann - forthcoming - Logica Universalis:1-26.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does Logic Have a History at All?Jens Lemanski - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-23.
Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge.K. N. Jayatilleke - 1963 - Foundations of Language 5 (4):560-562.
Aristotle "On Rhetoric": A Theory of Civic Discourse.George A. Kennedy - 1993 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (4):322-327.

View all 7 references / Add more references