Mission Impossible? Thinking What Must be Thought in Heidegger and Deleuze

Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 5 (2):336-354 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss and compare the possibility of thinking that which is most worth our thought in Deleuze’s What Is Philosophy? and Heidegger’s course lectures in What Is Called Thinking?. Both authors criticize the history of philosophy in similar ways in order to reconsider what should be taken as the nature and task of philosophical thinking. For Deleuze, true thinking is the creation of concepts, but what is most worth our thought in fact cannot be thought. For Heidegger, Being calls on us think, and to think rightly is to be underway toward thinking itself, a grateful heeding of Being. In this paper I explore the very possibility to think that which is most worth our thought. I will argue that although for both authors proper thinking as such is possible, thinking what is most worth our thought seems remarkably both possible as impossible.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genitalidad e potencia del pensamiento: Heidegger, Deleuze, Agamben.Sebastián Pimentel - 2015 - Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia) 13:124-143.
The honor of thinking: critique, theory, philosophy.Rodolphe Gasché - 2007 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Thinking through theatre.Maaike Bleeker - 2009 - In Laura Cull (ed.), Deleuze and performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 157.
Thinking Immanence: Gilles Deleuze and François Jullien [Spanish].Marcelo Sebastián Antonelli - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 19:81-106.
Beyond theism and atheism: Heidegger's significance for religious thinking.Robert S. Gall - 1987 - Hingham, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Making sense in education: Deleuze on thinking against common sense.Itay Snir - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (3):299-311.
Heidegger on the Nature of Thinking.Gene Dale Moore - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-30

Downloads
694 (#24,453)

6 months
79 (#62,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Corijn van Mazijk
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Difference and repetition.Gilles Deleuze - 1994 - London: Athlone Press.
Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy.Edmund Husserl - 1980 - Hingham, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Boston.
What is Philosophy?Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari - 1991 - Columbia University Press.
Being and Time.Ronald W. Hepburn - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):276.
Experience and judgment: investigations in a genealogy of logic.Edmund Husserl - 1973 - London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Edited by Ludwig Landgrebe.

View all 19 references / Add more references