Why Friendly AIs won’t be that Friendly: A Friendly Reply to Muehlhauser and Bostrom

AI and Society 35 (2):505–507 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Why We Need Friendly AI”, Luke Muehlhauser and Nick Bostrom propose that for our species to survive the impending rise of superintelligent AIs, we need to ensure that they would be human-friendly. This discussion note offers a more natural but bleaker outlook: that in the end, if these AIs do arise, they won’t be that friendly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Friendly atheism revisited.William L. Rowe - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):7-13.
Toward Eco-Friendly Aesthetics.Sheila Lintott - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (1):57-76.
Friendly Societies.C. H. L. Brown & J. A. G. Taylor - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
You Can't Buy Your Way Out of Veganism.Bob Fischer - 2016 - Between the Species 19 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-23

Downloads
165 (#117,978)

6 months
11 (#248,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?