The Pregnancy Rescue Case: a reply to Hendricks

Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):345-346 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ‘The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral’, Hendricks presents The Pregnancy Rescue Case. In this reply I argue that even if it would be better (i.e., less bad) for the abortion to be prevented in The Pregnancy Rescue Case, that does not mean that typical abortions are impermissible. I also argue that there is a possible explanation, consistent with the pro-choice view and empirically testable, as to why people would think it better for the abortion to be prevented in The Pregnancy Rescue Case.

Similar books and articles

The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral.Perry Hendricks - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):332-334.
When Is an Abortion Not an Abortion?Kimberly Mutcherson - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):206-210.
The Value of Pregnancy and the Meaning of Pregnancy Loss.Byron J. Stoyles - 2015 - Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (1):91-105.
Unfinished feticide.R. P. Jansen - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (2):61-70.
Creation and Abortion: An Essay in Moral and Legal Philosophy.F. M. Kamm - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Abortion, Rights, and Cabin Cases.William Simkulet - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (4):315-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-19

Downloads
110 (#162,261)

6 months
110 (#40,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral.Perry Hendricks - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):332-334.

Add more references