Is logic a theoretical or practical discipline? Kant and/or Bolzano

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (3):319-333 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does logic describe something or not? If not, is it a normative or practical discipline? Is there a radical division between the practical or normative level and the theoretical or descriptive level? A discipline is theoretical, we may say, if its main propositions contain descriptive expressions, such as “is” or “have”, but no normative expressions, such as “ought”, “ought not” or “may”. A discipline is normative if its main propositions are of the form “it ought to be”. Theoretical propositions express what is, whereas practical propositions express what should be. So a theoretical discipline is descriptive and a normative discipline is prescriptive, but what does a theoretical discipline describe?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#248,057)

6 months
5 (#649,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Bolzano and the Analytical Tradition.Sandra Lapointe - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):96-111.
Kant-Bibliographie 2002.Margit Ruffing - 2004 - Kant Studien 95 (4):505-538.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references