Condorcet: Communication/science/democracy

Critical Horizons 8 (1):18-32 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Condorcet's arguments concerning the dependence of unhindered scientific development on the presence of democratic conditions still sounds relevant today, because they are based on specific and complex considerations concerning the character of the social enterprise of science that articulates problems that still continue. The implicit dispute between Condorcet and Rousseau is also the first great historical example of the conflict between the Enlightenment and Romanticism, which accompanies the history of modernity, as an unresolved and indeed irresolvable opposition that belongs to the prehistory of our own confusions and quandaries concerning the relations between culture, science, politics and society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#163,475)

6 months
13 (#203,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Antipodean Enlightenment: Markus on Culture.John Grumley - 2013 - Critical Horizons 14 (2):156-180.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lumières de l'Utopie.Bronislaw Baczko - 1980 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 170 (2):236-238.

Add more references