The Invasive Species Diet: The Ethics of Eating Lionfish as a Wildlife Management Strategy

Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (3):320-335 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the ethical dimensions of lionfish removal and provides an argument supporting hunting lionfish for consumption. Lionfish are an invasive species found around the world. Their presence has fueled management strategies that predominantly rely on promoting human predation and consumption. We apply rights-based ethics, utilitarian ethics, and ecocentric environmental ethics to the question of whether hunting and eating lionfish is ethical. After applying these perspectives, we argue that, from a utilitarian perspective, lionfish should be culled. Rights-based ethics, on the other hand, are not applicable in this case, while ecocentric environmental ethics would support lionfish removal.

Similar books and articles

Identity and the Ethics of Eating Interventions.Megan A. Dean - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (3):353-364.
Human Sentiment and the Future of Wildlife.David E. Cooper - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):335 - 346.
The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism.Philip E. Devine - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (206):481-505.
Invasive Species and the Loss of Beta Diversity.Sarah Wright - 2011 - Ethics and the Environment 16 (1):75-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-10

Downloads
789 (#20,120)

6 months
351 (#5,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samantha Noll
Washington State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.
Fellow Creatures. Our Obligations to the Other Animals.Christine M. Korsgaard - 2018 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 73 (1):165-168.

View all 37 references / Add more references