The Will to Make‐Believe: Religious Fictionalism, Religious Beliefs, and the Value of Art

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (3):620-635 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I explore some of the reasons why, under specific circumstances, it may be rational to make-believe or imagine certain religious beliefs. Adopting a jargon familiar to certain contemporary philosophers, my main concern here is to assess what reasons can be given for adopting a fictionalist stance towards some religious beliefs. My understanding of fictionalism does not involve solely a propositional attitude but a broader stance, which may include certain acts of pretence. I also argue that a plausible reason to be fictionalist about a specific set of religious beliefs and practices has to do with the value of some artistic creations; namely, those that require the adoption of a religious point of view for their understanding.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A critique of religious fictionalism.Benjamin S. Cordry - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (1):77-89.
Against Theological Fictionalism.Roger Pouivet - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):427 - 437.
The role of religious and non-religious beliefs in medical decisions.Atsushi Asai & Yasuhiro Kadooka Aizawa - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (6):162-165.
Amyraut on Reason and Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (3-4):191-200.
The afterlife: beyond belief.Andrew Eshleman - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (2):163-183.
Forgiveness: Moral Prerogative or Religious Duty?Paul Lauritzen - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (2):141-154.
Bayle on the (Ir)rationality of Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569.
Conciliationism and Religious Disagreement.John Pittard - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain (eds.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford University Press. pp. 80-97.
Una proposta per la caratterizzazione della credenza religiosa.Daniele Bertini - 2014 - Dialegesthai. Rivista Telematica di Filosofia 16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-04

Downloads
214 (#95,385)

6 months
21 (#129,758)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Sauchelli
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

Did the Greeks believe in their myths?Alberto Voltolini - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
Teleological Fictionalism in Biology.Masaki Chiba - 2024 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 56 (2):67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.
The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans & John Mcdowell - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (238):534-538.
Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Mimesis as Make-Believe.Kendall Walton - 1996 - Synthese 109 (3):413-434.
Fiction and Metaphysics.Amie Thomasson - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):190-192.

View all 40 references / Add more references