Cosmopsychology around 1900: Paul Scheerbart in the context of Plato, Cusanus, Kant, Fechner, and Lovelock

Intellectual History Review 34 (1):213-229 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Paul Scheerbart (1863–1915) is rarely referred to as a philosopher. He is known as the author of Glasarchitektur (1914), and of numerous books, essays, and stories of “fantasy” and anti-militarism. As a follower of Berkeley’s skepticism, he proposed an aesthetic of the fantastic, an art program in contrast to current realism and impressionism. Studying technical and scientific progress, he developed alternative ideas, in a unique blend of fiction and science. His “astro-” or “cosmopsychology” is a variant of ancient panpsychism or, as Jan Assmann calls it, cosmotheism, which was suppressed by the “Mosaic distinction,” the introduction of true and false in things religious. Exponents of this dualism are the supporters of the “Great chain of being” (Lovejoy): Plato, Nicholas of Cusa, and Kant in his refutation of hylozoism. The late Kant, however, comes close to Scheerbart in calling planet Earth an “organic,” though not “living” body. Fechner and, after him, Scheerbart overcome such hesitation. In Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis, scrutinized by Bruno Latour, the old intuition of a non-dualistic eco-holism takes on its actual form.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nikolaus Cusanus.Paul Sandor - 1977 - Mitteilungen Und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 12:177-178.
Konzilsidee und Kollegialität nach Cusanus.Paul Sigmund - 1965 - Mitteilungen Und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 5:86-97.
Konsens, Repräsentation und die Herrschaft der Mehrheit bei Marsilius und Cusanus.Paul Sigmund - 1998 - Mitteilungen Und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 24:195-204.
Why Gaia is not a God of Totality.Bruno Latour - 2017 - Theory, Culture and Society 34 (2-3):61-81.
A criticism of Shmuel Hugo Bergman's account of Nicolaus cusanus.Joseph Horovitz - 1986 - In Abraham Zvie Bar-On (ed.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press. pp. 95-113.
Das Verhältnis von Papst und Bischöfen nach Cusanus und sein Postulat eines "ständigen kleinen Konzils".Paul Sigmund - 1994 - Mitteilungen Und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 21:211-225.
A Criticism of Shmuel Hugo Bergman's Account of Nicolaus Cusanus.Joseph Horovitz - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 24 (1):95-113.
A Criticism of Shmuel Hugo Bergman's Account of Nicolaus Cusanus.Joseph Horovitz - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 24 (1):95-113.
Fausts Vergessen.Claudia Keller - 2017 - Zeitschrift für Ästhetik Und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 62 (1):124-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-12

Downloads
15 (#953,629)

6 months
15 (#174,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?