The Doomsday Argument Revisited (a Stop in the Shooting-Room Included)

Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):109-122 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leslie’s doomsday argument purports to show that the likelihood of the human race perishing soon is greater than we think. The probability we attach to it, based on our estimate of the chance of various calamities which might bring extinction about (a nuclear holocaust, an ecological disaster, etc.), should be adjusted as follows. If the human race were to survive for a long time, we, livingnow, would be atypical. So our living now increases the probability that the human race will end shortly. In this paper, I criticize some attempts to rebut the argument, and present my own. To facilitate the analysis, I consider a structurally similar problem, the “ShootingRoom.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The doomsday argument and the number of possible observers.Ken D. Olum - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):164-184.
The doomsday argument without knowledge of birth rank.Bradley Monton - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):79–82.
The doomsday argument.Nick Bostrom - 2008 - Think 6 (17-18):23-28.
The doomsday argument and Hempel's problem.Paul Franceschi - 1999 - [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)] 29 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
64 (#255,000)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Weintraub
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references