The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.
Question | Answer | Comments | |
A priori knowledge: yes or no? | The question is too unclear to answer | All human knowledge emerges from experience and tradition which are a priori and learned; the principles of meaning-construction, -testing, and -applying may also be a priori but transcendental. | |
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism? | The question is too unclear to answer | The basic question is : how are abstract objects constituted from experienced particulars? How do particulars relate to abstract concepts? There is much to be learned from the sciences about this. | |
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective? | The question is too unclear to answer | Value is clearly both a quality within the world (objective?) and a quality that we and society respond to (subjective?). The question needs to be framed better. | |
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? | The question is too unclear to answer | This is kind of question puts philosophy into a straight jacket as if it were one of the natural sciences. | |
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | Is this a version of the Mind-Body question? Or is it a version of physicalism/non-physicalism? | |
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism? | The question is too unclear to answer | The notion of 'world' is far too complex to be described preferentially by any "-ism"; the three theories given above are three instruments for different analyzes that do not exhaust possible philosophical interest in the world | |
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will? | The question is too unclear to answer | So far, all the questions are specific to certain contents of discourse, that omit much that may be relevant to any genuine philosophical discourse. | |
God: theism or atheism? | The question is too unclear to answer | What meaning is attached to "God"? The answer depends on the genre of discourse about (what is being referred to as) "God". | |
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? | The question is too unclear to answer | Neither or both - depending on the philosophical discourse; the characteristics of knowledge go far beyond rationlism and empiricism. | |
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism? | The question is too unclear to answer | Knowledge is hermeneutical, i.e., interpretative, and the context of the discourse, as well as the relative invariance of the concepts used is important ...as much else omitted from the list. | |
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? | Other | | |
Logic: classical or non-classical? | Accept both | Classical logic has its contextual limits of applicability; most ordinary discourse, as well as the languages about the micro- as well as the cosmological world are non-classical. | |
Mental content: internalism or externalism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | "Mental content", I assume, is a reaching out cognitively to the world. This involves 'representations' that are both 'external to' what is represented, and internal to the act of representation. | |
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? | The question is too unclear to answer | If the 'real' is the world we live in, the 'moral' has to be a function of the 'real' as humans live in it. | |
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? | Accept both | Which is appropriate depends on the purpose and genre of the discourse | |
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism? | Accept both | Accept both, answer depends on the genre of the discourse | |
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism? | The question is too unclear to answer | Moral judgment can be analyzed cognitively and non-cognitively, each is viable, and which is the more relevant depends on the genre of discourse. | |
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? | The question is too unclear to answer | Clearly a sense of morality is both acquired by living in a community and a matter of personal choice about how one relates to society and the world around. | |
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics? | The question is too unclear to answer | There is clearly room for all three; which to use will depend on the context of the discourse. | |
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | The "-isms" worries me, because they assume that that there is only one kind of philosophical discourse about perception; this is the weakness of analytic philosophy | |
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? | The question is too unclear to answer | Personal identity involves all three and more; which is relevant depends on the genre of discourse | |
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism? | The question is too unclear to answer | These three terms are instruments useful for the analysis of any particular socio-political situation;but they are just useful instruments, not Truth!
| |
Proper names: Fregean or Millian? | The question is too unclear to answer | The context of this question is too limited to be of much philosophical interest | |
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism? | The question is too unclear to answer | If "reality" is the ontology of the world we live in,and since this is socio-historical in nature (otherwise, we don't know what we are talking about), then scientific phenomena are real in this sense .. and not in an "-ism" sense. | |
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death? | Accept: survival | But will our survival be in space and time? Or be like a photon timeless? | |
Time: A-theory or B-theory? | The question is too unclear to answer | I am not sure what the context of this question is; of course classical and quantum mechanics, insofar as they are theories, can both be correctly used but only in different contexts of discourse and use. | |
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch? | The question is too unclear to answer | | |
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic? | The question is too unclear to answer | Truth (other than formal truth of math, etc.)cannot be separated from values and action ... and therefore context of practice. | |
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | The possibility and non-possibility of Zombies concern evolution and cultural development that involve changes unanticipated (whether as possible or not) changes in the world we live in. | |