Bringing back the magic: Reimagining the role of temperament in philosophical theory, a new model of the self as entwined, embodied and enchanted

Abstract

This dissertation examines the question of the ‘true’ or ‘essential’ self. It suggests two sets of interrelated propositions. The first set includes these following claims: 1) that all philosophical or scientific theories of the self are fundamentally driven by the personality type or temperament of the theorizer; 2) that the entire philosophical tradition has been dominated by two personality types or temperaments, what William James has called the ‘tender-minded and the ‘tough-minded’ temperaments; 3) that the question of the self, philosophically speaking, only really became a proper topic of study after the Renaissance, and especially after the work of Rene Descartes in the seventeenth-century; 4) that only in the eighteenth century did a third philosophical temperament, what I call the ‘self-minded’ temperament, appear in the form of Jean Jacques Rousseau; 5) that the dominant contemporary theories of the self, which I identify as social constructionist theory and the neuroscientific theory, are the creations of individuals bearing the tough-minded temperament and, 6) that both the tender-minded and tough-minded thinker is not temperamentally suited to describing or understanding the nature of the true or essential self. The second set argues the following claims: 1) that the self-minded temperament is the philosophical temperament best suited to understanding the nature of the true self; 2) that the true self is paradoxically contingent and metaphysical in nature; 3) that there are occult or esoteric technologies, such as Vedic and Western astrology and the Enneagram, that offer a powerful set of tools for understanding the individual self; 4) that these tools have been rejected by most thinkers in the Western philosophical, scientific, and religious traditions because they challenge the fundamental beliefs of those traditions, especially the belief in free will and scientific progress; 5) that this ‘third’ realm of insight into the human self is the realm of the ‘enchanted’, and 6) that any complete theoretical model of the human self must include some serious consideration of these ‘enchanted’ technologies if they are to truly be complete.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Physiology and Psychology of Temperament: Pragmatism in Context.Francesca Bordogna - 2001 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37:3-25.
On equal temperament.Michael Halewood - 2015 - History of the Human Sciences 28 (3):3-21.
Traits across cultures: A neo-Allportian perspective.Brad Piekkola - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (1):2.
The Metaphysics of the Confucian Temperament.Zhi-Ping Yu - 2003 - Philosophy and Culture 30 (10):5-26.
On Being Nemesētikos as a Mean.John C. Coker - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:61-92.
Explaining Personality: Soul Theory versus Behavior Genetics.Jean Mercer - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 69-81.
Reversibility.Claude Lefort - 1985 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (63):106-120.
Simon Stevin's equal division of the octave.H. Floris Cohen - 1987 - Annals of Science 44 (5):471-488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-03

Downloads
17 (#873,341)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references