Regendering the U.S. Abortion Debate

Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (1):127-140 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper originated in a conference presentation with my colleague Michael Tooley, at which we were both asked to re-evaluate articles about abortion that each of us had written over twenty years earlier. While Tooley and I both contended that abortion should be legally unrestricted, there were striking differences in the style and content of our respective arguments. Contemplating these differences has reinforced my own belief in the importance of emphasizing the centrality of gender when discussing abortion. Since gender as we know it is a system of dominance as well as difference , I take this to mean that contemporary discussions of abortion must address the relationship between abortion access and the social status of women. My early article addressed this relationship to some extent, but the present paper will raise a number of additional gender issues that the early article did not mention

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
74 (#224,022)

6 months
4 (#796,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison Jaggar
University of Colorado, Boulder

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references