Actions of tame abelian product groups

Journal of Mathematical Logic 23 (3) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Polish group G is tame if for any continuous action of G, the corresponding orbit equivalence relation is Borel. When [Formula: see text] for countable abelian [Formula: see text], Solecki [Equivalence relations induced by actions of Polish groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (1995) 4765–4777] gave a characterization for when G is tame. In [L. Ding and S. Gao, Non-archimedean abelian Polish groups and their actions, Adv. Math. 307 (2017) 312–343], Ding and Gao showed that for such G, the orbit equivalence relation must in fact be potentially [Formula: see text], while conjecturing that the optimal bound could be [Formula: see text]. We show that the optimal bound is [Formula: see text] by constructing an action of such a group G which is not potentially [Formula: see text], and show how to modify the analysis of [L. Ding and S. Gao, Non-archimedean abelian Polish groups and their actions, Adv. Math. 307 (2017) 312–343] to get this slightly better upper bound. It follows, using the results of Hjorth et al. [Borel equivalence relations induced by actions of the symmetric group, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 92 (1998) 63–112], that this is the optimal bound for the potential complexity of actions of tame abelian product groups. Our lower-bound analysis involves forcing over models of set theory where choice fails for sequences of finite sets.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Diagonal Actions and Borel Equivalence Relations.Longyun Ding & Su Gao - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1081 - 1096.
Borel reductions of profinite actions of SL n.Samuel Coskey - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (10):1270-1279.
The model theory of finitely generated finite-by-Abelian groups.Francis Oger - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1115-1124.
The dp-rank of Abelian groups.Yatir Halevi & Daniel Palacín - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (3):957-986.
P-compatible Abelian groups.Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):253-263.
Computable Abelian groups.Alexander G. Melnikov - 2014 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):315-356,.
Some model theory of Abelian groups.Paul C. Eklof - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):335-342.
Axiomatization of abelian-by- G groups for a finite group G.Francis Oger - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (7):515-521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-08

Downloads
17 (#873,676)

6 months
15 (#172,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set Theory.Thomas Jech - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):300-300.
Cohen and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):351-378.
New jump operators on equivalence relations.John D. Clemens & Samuel Coskey - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (3).
Levy and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 140 (1):233-252.

Add more references