Ethical Sensibilities for Practicing Care in Management and Organization Research

Journal of Business Ethics 190 (2):279-294 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Management and organization researchers are being called to conduct research that is more caring, yet the concept of care and how to practice it within the profession is undertheorized. Adopting a feminist epistemology and methodology, we develop the concept of care by weaving the personal, ethical, and political into the research process. First, we reflect critically on how aspects of care—attentiveness, responsibility, competence, and responsiveness (Tronto, Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care, Routledge, 1993; Tronto, Caring democracy: markets, equality, and justice, New York University Press, 2013)—unfolded in our personal research experiences, and secondly, we conduct a review of articles published in management and organization studies and analyse expressed or concealed conceptions of care in scholars’ accounts of research purpose and ethics. We find three ethical sensibilities at the heart of enacting care: encountering the ‘other’, interpreting roles and responsibilities, and deliberating needs and resources. We contribute to a feminist research ethics by highlighting issues related to care that are concealed in dominant ethos guiding management and organization research. Further, we develop methodological insights for implementing an ethic of care as an alternative ethical standpoint in business research ethics. Finally, we provide suggestions for how to embed more care within research ethics practices in academic institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Issues in Business: Perspectives from the Business Academic Community.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):141-141.
Erratum: Predictors of Ethical Code Use and Ethical Tolerance in the Public Sector.[author unknown] - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):377-377.
Ethical Research in Business Ethics.Gazi Islam & Michelle Greenwood - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 182 (1):1-5.
V Chemnitz East Forum 21–23 March 2001 "Human Resource Management in Transition".[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):363-364.
A comparison of five business philosophies.Paul Miesing & John F. Preble - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (6):465 - 476.
Frontiers and new vistas in women in management research.Uma Sekaran - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (4-5):247 - 255.
Erratum: Applying the Principles of Gestalt Theory to Teaching Ethics.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):880-880.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-13

Downloads
39 (#410,346)

6 months
36 (#100,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references