Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness

Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can a supercompact cardinal κ be Laver indestructible when there is a level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness? In this article, we show that if there is a sufficiently large cardinal above κ, then no, it cannot. Conversely, if one weakens the requirement either by demanding less indestructibility, such as requiring only indestructibility by stratified posets, or less level-by-level agreement, such as requiring it only on measure one sets, then yes, it can

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On measurable limits of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688.
Level Compactness.Gillman Payette & Blaine D'Entremont - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (4):545-555.
Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible.Joel David Hamkins - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
Two concepts of agreement.Christian List - 2002 - The Good Society 11 (1):72-79.
Measurability and degrees of strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (2):249-254.
Representing high-level properties in perceptual experience.Parker Crutchfield - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):279 - 294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#176,292)

6 months
37 (#100,056)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joel David Hamkins
Oxford University

References found in this work

On strong compactness and supercompactness.Telis K. Menas - 1975 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (4):327-359.
The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
Destruction or preservation as you like it.Joel David Hamkins - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 91 (2-3):191-229.

View all 7 references / Add more references