ChatGPT is no Stochastic Parrot. But it also Claims that 1 is Greater than 1

Philosophy and Technology 36 (3):1-29 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a commentary on ChatGPT and LLMs (Large Language Models) in general. It argues that this technology has matured to the point where calling systems such as ChatGPT “stochastic parrots” is no longer warranted. But it also argues that these systems continue to have serious limitations when it comes to reasoning. These limitations are much more severe than commonly thought. A large array of examples are given to support these claims.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bias Optimizers.Damien P. Williams - 2023 - American Scientist 111 (4):204-207.
ChatGPT.Andrej Poleev - 2023 - Enzymes 21.
ChatGPT: Temptations of Progress.Rushabh H. Doshi, Simar S. Bajaj & Harlan M. Krumholz - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (4):6-8.
What Should ChatGPT Mean for Bioethics?I. Glenn Cohen - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):8-16.
ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?Damian Okaibedi Eke - 2023 - Journal of Responsible Technology 13 (C):100060.
The principles of a stochastic formulation of quantum theory.A. Kyprianidis - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (12):1449-1483.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-21

Downloads
94 (#184,321)

6 months
60 (#79,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references