Bloomsbury History: Theory and Method (
2022)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
Droysen’s Grundriss der Historik is one of the most important nineteenth-century texts on
history, historiography, and historical research. An English version of the work, published in
1893 as Outline of the Principles of History, is the translation reproduced here, with some
glosses on the text. A more literal, and also more adequate, rendering of the title is Outline of
the Theory of History. “History” in “theory of history” is more closely tied to Historie than to
Geschichte—the two German words normally used as equivalent to it. This is in keeping with
Droysen’s predominant focus on history as a form of knowledge. However, as will be shown,
Droysen’s theory is no pure epistemology, since it addresses not only methodical or
representational issues attached to “history” but also material and normative ones. Contemporary and later commentators acknowledged Droysen’s reflections as synthesizing
and elaborating the presuppositions of classical German historicism. According to Hans-Georg
Gadamer Droysen was the “sharpest methodologist” of the nineteenth-century German “historical school,” whose theory of history had “groundbreaking
significance” for the philosophy of the human sciences. As this suggests, the Outline is part of
an inquiry on historical method that went far beyond the technicalities of historical research
and deep into its epistemic, ontological, moral, political, and religious roots.
Many of the Outline’s arguments tackle problems still important within early twenty-first century historical cultures. To a large extent, Droysen’s questions on history and
historiography are still our questions. He explored aesthetical and representational issues
pertaining to history writing and reception. He strongly contested the single-mindedness of
many of his fellow historians about source criticism, calling attention to other important
methodical operations in the process of historical knowledge, and to sources other than
written, official texts. He insisted that research should be conducted according to a logic of
questions and answers, a point now established as part of our methodological common sense.
Furthermore, he argued that research questions are embedded in cultural and political
dynamics, and accordingly that whatever historical objectivity is, it cannot presuppose the
extinction of subjectivity. In Droysen’s Outline, knowledge of the past is depicted as an
essentially interpretative way of cognition which is full of ethical potential for the present. By
developing a hermeneutical approach that was very explicit about its ethical implications,
Droysen illuminated—perhaps like no one else in his century—the enigmatic problem of the
nature of the “historical.”