Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues [Book Review]

Dialogue 39 (3):628-630 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

MacIntyre’s latest volume ranks among his best works to date. Together with his last three books, Dependent Rational Animals forms a body of work unrivalled in contemporary social and ethical philosophy. In this short space I will consider both how the new book relates to MacIntyre’s earlier work and some new lines of argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book Reviews. [REVIEW]J. Horton - 2002 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):225-233.
Dependent Rational Animals. Why Human Beings need the Virtues.Alasdair Macintyre - 1999 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (3):389-390.
Animals in the Kingdom of Ends.Heather M. Kendrick - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):2.
Dependent Rational Animals. [REVIEW]Nicholas Meriwether - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):384-390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
32 (#504,058)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Exemplars, Ethics, and Illness Narratives.Ian James Kidd - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (4):323-334.
Pellegrino, MacIntyre, and the internal morality of clinical medicine.Xavier Symons - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (3):243-251.
Recent Work in Applied Virtue Ethics.Guy Axtell & Philip Olson - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):183-204.
(Кібер)Простори Дозвілля.Георгій Храбров - 2023 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 69:21-27.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references