- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Where the Paths Meet: Remarks on Truth and Paradox
In Felicia Ackerman (ed.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 169–198 (1981)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Nature: Two Conceptions of Truth Background on Logic and Paradox Nature and Logic And Now Revenge References.Author Profiles
where paths meet – remarks on truth and paradox nature path – concerns metaphysical questions about the “nature,” (truth) logic path – concerns logical issues arising from truth‐theoretic paradoxes semantic view of truth – a representative of a substantial and correspondence‐inspired answer to the nature question transparent view of truth – a form of deflationism taking a skeptical stance towards the nature question sentences – bearers of truth particularly, sentences of an interpreted language classical restriction strategy – seeks to reevaluate truth bearers in semantic terms contextualist strategy – combines features of classical restriction strategy and Tarskian strategy
My notes
Similar books and articles
Where the Paths Meet: Remarks on Truth and Paradox.Jc Beall - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):169-198.
Semantyczna teoria prawdy a antynomie semantyczne [Semantic Theory of Truth vs. Semantic Antinomies].Jakub Pruś - 2021 - Rocznik Filozoficzny Ignatianum 1 (27):341–363.
Truth & Transcendence: Turning the Tables on the Liar Paradox.Gila Sher - 2017 - In Bradley Armour-Garb (ed.), Reflections on the Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 281-306.
So truth is safe from paradox: now what?Stewart Shapiro - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):445-455.
Truth, logical validity and determinateness: A commentary on field’s saving truth from paradox.P. D. Welch - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):348-359.
Modes of Truth: The Unified Approach to Truth, Modality, and Paradox.Carlo Nicolai & Johannes Stern (eds.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
A Unified Theory of Truth and Paradox.Lorenzo Rossi - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):209-254.
Lessons on truth from mediaeval solutions to the liar paradox.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):58-78.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
9 (#1,258,729)
6 months
6 (#530,265)
2023-06-15
Downloads
9 (#1,258,729)
6 months
6 (#530,265)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
A semantic challenge to non-realist cognitivism.David Copp - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3-4):569-591.
Jc Beall’s current and potential impact on the continental philosophy of non-classical logics.Corry Shores - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo