Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363

Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Argumentation from Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.Eveline Feteris - unknown - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Springer.
The Rational Reconstruction of Complex Forms of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Artificial Intelligence and Law and Pragma-Dialectics. [REVIEW]Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):393-400.
Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). [REVIEW]William Twining - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):223-229.
The Analysis and Evaluation of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory.Eveline Feteris & Harm Klossterhuis - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Introduction: Models for the Analysis of Legal Argumentation.Eveline Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):1-5.
Models for the analysis of legal argumentation: introduction.Eveline Feteris - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):1-5.
Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives'.Eveline Feteris - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):235-239.
Pragmatic argumentation and the application of legal rules.Eveline T. Feteris - unknown
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
The role of the judge in legal proceedings: A Pragma-dialectical analysis.Eveline T. Feteris - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):234-252.
Critical Notice of 'Fundamentos de la argumentación jurídica: revisión de las teorías sobre la justificación de las decisiones judiciales' by Evelin Feteris. [REVIEW]María G. Navarro - 2011 - Ideas Y Valores 60 (145):155-163.
The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation in Complex Structures of Legal Justification.Eveline Feteris - unknown
The Soundness of Pragmatic Argumentation: Does the End Justify the Means?Feteris T. Eveline - unknown
The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-31

Downloads
43 (#371,989)

6 months
13 (#200,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.

View all 33 references / Add more references