The ergodic hierarchy, randomness and Hamiltonian chaos

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (4):661-691 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Various processes are often classified as both deterministic and random or chaotic. The main difficulty in analysing the randomness of such processes is the apparent tension between the notions of randomness and determinism: what type of randomness could exist in a deterministic process? Ergodic theory seems to offer a particularly promising theoretical tool for tackling this problem by positing a hierarchy, the so-called ‘ergodic hierarchy’, which is commonly assumed to provide a hierarchy of increasing degrees of randomness. However, that notion of randomness requires clarification. The mathematical definition of EH does not make explicit appeal to randomness; nor does the usual way of presenting EH involve a specification of the notion of randomness that is supposed to underlie the hierarchy. In this paper we argue that EH is best understood as a hierarchy of random behaviour if randomness is explicated in terms of unpredictability. We then show that, contrary to common wisdom, EH is useful in characterising the behaviour of Hamiltonian dynamical systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ergodic hierarchy.Roman Frigg & Joseph Berkovitz - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Computability of the ergodic decomposition.Mathieu Hoyrup - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (5):542-549.
Order beyond periodicity: Fighting chaos for quasiperiodic motion of nonlinear Hamiltonian systems.Melvyn S. Berger - 1995 - In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy & A. R. Peacocke (eds.), Chaos and Complexity. Vatican Observatory Publications. pp. 185.
Defining chaos.Robert W. Batterman - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (1):43-66.
Book review: explaining chaos. [REVIEW]Roman Frigg & Joseph Berkovitz - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):201-205.
Słabe łamanie ergodyczności vs. determinizm.Andrzej Fuliński - 2015 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 59:83-100.
Probabilistic algorithmic randomness.Sam Buss & Mia Minnes - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (2):579-601.
A Constructive View on Ergodic Theorems.Bas Spitters - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):611 - 623.
How much randomness is needed for statistics?Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen, Antoine Taveneaux & Neil Thapen - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (9):1470-1483.
Peter Smith explaining chaos.Roman Frigg & Joseph Berkovitz - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):201-205.
Book review: explaining chaos. [REVIEW]Peter Smith, Roman Frigg & Joseph Berkovitz - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):201-205.
Review of Peter Smith:" Explaining Chaos". [REVIEW]Roman Frigg & Joseph Berkovitz - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):201-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
378 (#54,332)

6 months
32 (#105,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Roman Frigg
London School of Economics
Joseph Berkovitz
University of Toronto, St. George

Citations of this work

Probabilities in Statistical Mechanics.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2016 - In Alan Hájek & Christopher Hitchcock (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 573-600.
What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?Charlotte Werndl - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):195-220.
Stable regularities without governing laws?Aldo Filomeno - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66:186-197.
Are deterministic descriptions and indeterministic descriptions observationally equivalent?Charlotte Werndl - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (3):232-242.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation, nomic subsumption, and the concept of event.Jaegwon Kim - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (8):217-236.
Chaos out of order: Quantum mechanics, the correspondence principle and chaos.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (2):147-182.

Add more references