Noise in the World

Philosophy of Science 77 (5):778-791 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay uses Györgi Buzsáki's use of EEG data to draw conclusions about brain function as an example to show that investigators sometimes draw conclusions from noisy data by analyzing the noise rather than by extracting a signal from it. The example makes vivid some important differences between McAllister's, Woodward's, and my ideas about how data are interpreted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Noise matters: towards an ontology of noise.Greg Hainge - 2013 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Unjust Noise.Paul Voice - 2009 - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics/Etikk I Praksis 3 (2):85-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-01

Downloads
53 (#307,764)

6 months
23 (#125,496)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Bogen
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework.Sabina Leonelli - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):810-821.
Cognitive Variation: The Philosophical Landscape.Zina B. Ward - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (10):e12882.
Experimental Artefacts.Carl F. Craver & Talia Dan-Cohen - 2024 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (1):253-274.
The Ontology of Patterns in Empirical Data.James W. McAllister - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):804-814.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Saving the phenomena.James Bogen & James Woodward - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (3):303-352.

Add more references