Agents necessitating effects in newtonian time and space: from power and opportunity to effectivity

Synthese 196 (1):31-68 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We extend stit logic by adding a spatial dimension. This enables us to distinguish between powers and opportunities of agents. Powers are agent-specific and do not depend on an agent’s location. Opportunities do depend on locations, and are the same for every agent. The central idea is to define the real possibility to see to the truth of a condition in space and time as the combination of the power and the opportunity to do so. The focus on agent-relative powers and space-relative opportunities firmly roots effectivity of an autonomous choice making agent in a space–time picture. Our space–time view will be classically Newtonian, since we will assume relativistic phenomena do not play a role in agentive effectivity. We show how our semantics naturally distinguishes between different kinds of histories; histories that reflect real possibilities and histories that reflect counterfactual possibilities. Furthermore, we discuss how the spatial picture sheds light on conceptual problems plaguing the central stit property of ‘independence of agency’. At several points in the article we will emphasise and defend the differences with Belnap’s theory of agency in relativistic branching space–times.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A limited conventionalist critique of Newtonian space-time.David Zaret - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (3):474-494.
Rethinking Newton’s Principia.Simon Saunders - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (1):22-48.
Space-time relationism in Newtonian and relativistic physics.Dennis Dieks - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):5 – 17.
Sklar's Maneuver.Bradford Skow - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):777-786.
Raumwissenschaften.Stephan Günzel (ed.) - 2009 - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Newtonian space-time.Howard Stein - 1967 - Texas Quarterly 10 (3):174--200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-29

Downloads
32 (#504,058)

6 months
8 (#373,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Broersen
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

Temporal logic.Antony Galton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Axiomatizing norms across time and the 'Paradox of the Court'.Daniela Glavaničová & Matteo Pascucci - 2021 - In Fenrong Liu, Alessandra Marra, Paul Portner & Frederik Van de Putte (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. Proceedings of DEON 2020/2021. College Publications. pp. 201-218.
Temporal logic.Temporal Logic - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Modal Logic: An Introduction.Brian F. Chellas - 1980 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Marc H. Bornstein - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):203-206.
Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality.Barbara Vetter - 2015 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references