Response to Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”

Hypatia 7 (3):162-165 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bordo argues that the “theoretics of heterogeneity” taken too far prevents us from being able make generalizations or broadly conceptual statements about women. 1 argue that the political efficacy of feminism does not depend on the capacity to speak from the perspective of “women” and that the insistence on the heterogeneity of the category of women does not imply an opposition to abstraction but rather moves abstract thinking in a self-critical and democratizing direction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Maleness” Revisited.Susan Bordo - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (3):197-207.
AFTERWORD: The Feminist as Other.Susan Bordo - 1997 - In Janet A. Kourany (ed.), Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions. Princeton University Press. pp. 296-312.
Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes.Susan Bordo (ed.) - 1999 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Bad apples: Feminist politics and feminist scholarship.Alan Soble - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):354-388.
Gender and Other Categories.Linda Fisher - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (3):173 - 179.
Musings: Adoption.Susan Bordo - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (1):230-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
63 (#257,831)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Judith Butler
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references