- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why Not?
In Russell Blackford & Udo Schüklenk (eds.), 50 Voices of Disbelief. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 105–111 (2009-09-10)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Notes.Author's Profile
Sean M. Carroll ‐ Why Not? What does God mean? atheists trying to explain why they don't believe in God “The Supreme Being, creator and ruler of the universe” notion of God ‐ is well worth confronting about what God is supposed to mean, without reaching much of a consensus The truth is, effects would require causes ‐ Aristotle and Plato, right about the physical world God is not necessary ‐ relatively innocent God of theological conception arguments for God ‐ little more than excess baggage, to be discarded
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why (Almost All) Cosmologists Are Atheists.Sean Carroll - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):622-635.
Different researchers’ opinion based survey: On the insights and the beliefs’ regarding the existence of God in various religions to the atheistic belief with ‘no presence of God at all’.Deep Bhattacharjee - manuscript
God in process thought: a study in Charles Hartshorne's concept of God.Santiago Sia - 1985 - Boston: M. Nijhoff.
On the Carroll-Chen Model (Long Unpublished Version on arxiv).Christopher Gregory Weaver - manuscript
Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?Sean M. Carroll - 2022 - In Eleanor Knox & Alastair Wilson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. London, UK: Routledge.
Does the Universe Need God?Sean Carroll - 2012 - In J. B. Stump & Alan G. Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 185-197.
The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself . By SeanCarroll. Pp. ix, 470, NY, Dutton Press, 2016, $28.00. [REVIEW]Benjamin Murphy - 2019 - Heythrop Journal 60 (1):111-111.
On the Concepts of "Heaven" and "the Creator" in Zhuangzi's Philosophy.Yun Ma - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (9):79-96.
The Universe Waking Up: A Useful Idea for Atheists.Bruce Milem - 2024 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 10 (1):135-152.
Poetic naturalism: Sean Carroll, science, and moral objectivity.Whitley Kaufman - 2017 - Zygon 52 (1):196-211.
God’s spatial unlocatedness prevents him from being the creator of the universe: A new argument for the nonexistence of God.Jeffrey Grupp - 2006 - Sophia 45 (1):5-23.
Doctor Strange, Moral Responsibility, and the God Question.Christopher P. Klofft - 2018 - In Mark D. White (ed.), Doctor Strange and Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 238–249.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
11 (#1,144,917)
6 months
4 (#799,256)
2023-06-15
Downloads
11 (#1,144,917)
6 months
4 (#799,256)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-8qzwx uwo