Contrastive Support: Some Competing Accounts

Synthese 190 (1) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I outline four competing probabilistic accounts of contrastive evidential support and consider various considerations that might help arbitrate between these. The upshot of the discussion is that the so-called ‘Law of Likelihood’ is to be preferred to any of the alternatives considered.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contrastive Explanations as Social Accounts.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (4):263-284.
Contrastive statistical explanation and causal heterogeneity.Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):435-452.
On d-trees, beans, and b-accents.Daniel Büring - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5):511 - 545.
Contrastive Bayesianism.Branden Fitelson - 2013 - In Martijn Blaauw (ed.), Contrastivism in philosophy. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Contrastive knowledge.Antti Karjalainen & Adam Morton - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (2):74 – 89.
Contrastive causation.Jonathan Schaffer - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (3):327-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-07

Downloads
106 (#167,207)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

State of the field: Measuring information and confirmation.Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47 (C):81-90.
Genuine confirmation and tacking by conjunction.Michael Schippers & Gerhard Schurz - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1):321-352.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references