Three Skeptics and the Critique: Review of Michael Forster's Kant and Skepticism

Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A long critical notice of Michael Forster's recent book, "Kant and Skepticism." We argue that Forster's characterization of Kant's response to skepticism is both textually dubious and philosophically flawed. -/- .

Similar books and articles

Greek skepticism; a study in epistemology.Charlotte L. Stough - 1969 - Berkeley,: University of California Press.
Pyrrhonian skepticism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Contemporary skepticism.Duncan Pritchard - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Skeptics Can Win (But Almost Never Will).Timothy Pickavance - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):371-394.
The impossibility of local skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Kant's response to skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford handbook of skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 265.
Review: Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW]Craig French - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (2):334-335.
Review: Forster, Michael, Kant and Skepticism[REVIEW]Robert Hanna - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):635-637.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-14

Downloads
701 (#23,832)

6 months
98 (#47,029)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew Chignell
Princeton University
Colin McLear
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

The Dissatisfied Skeptic in Kant's Discipline of Pure Reason.Charles Goldhaber - 2023 - Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 4 (2):157-177.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references