Do Logic and Religion Mix?

In Duncan Pritchard & Mark Harris (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Religion for Everyone. London, UK: (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Logic is the study of the validity of arguments, which is to say the study of when a conclusion follows or does not follow from a set of premises. Logic is an ancient discipline pioneered by Aristotle and developed by some of the greatest thinkers in the Middle Ages. However, in the nineteenth century logic underwent a remarkable transformation into a precise branch of mathematics that changed the nature of logic, and the study of religion, forever. Both religious adherents and critics of religion have sometimes claimed that logic and religion do not mix, but this is a puzzling claim since logic itself is not a set of substantive premises about the world which may come into conflict with religious claims, but a means of testing mathematically which premises come into conflict with which other premises. In fact, sense can be made of whether logic and religion mix, but the question, and the answer, turn out to be more complex than many have thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modal Logic vs. Ontological Argument.Andrezej Biłat - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):179--185.
Logic and Normativity.Elizabeth Olsen - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Otago
The Modal Ontological Argument Meets Modal Fictionalism.Ted Parent - 2016 - Analytic Philosophy 57 (4):338-352.
Inductive Logic.Franz Huber - 2008 - In J. Lachs R. Talisse (ed.), Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. Routledge.
Which Modal Logic Is the Right One?John P. Burgess - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):81-93.
A Logical Choice.Tracy Lupher - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):237-246.
On the logic of the ontological argument.Paul E. Oppenheimer & Edward N. Zalta - 1991 - Philosophical Perspectives 5:509-529.
Provability logic.Rineke Verbrugge - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Making Sense of Paraconsistent Logic: The Nature of Logic, Classical Logic and Paraconsistent Logic.Koji Tanaka - 2013 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Springer. pp. 15--25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-17

Downloads
3 (#1,716,188)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Collin
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

Reverse Ontological Argument.James Henry Collin - 2022 - Analysis 82 (3):410-416.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references