Ehrenhaft’s Experiments on Magnetic Monopoles: Reconsidering the Feyerabend-Ehrenhaft Connection

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):69-94 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper introduces and reproduces a document from Feyerabend’s Nachlass including: (i) Feyerabend’s 1967 tentative translation into English of an original German typescript reporting the lecture notes of an academic course on magnetic monopoles delivered by physicist Felix Ehrenhaft (1879-1952) at the University of Vienna in the 1947 summer semester; and (ii) Feyerabend’s memoir focusing on Ehrenhaft in postwar Vienna.In addition to making available to a larger audience Ehrenhaft’s lectures on a highly controversial topic, the publication of Feyerabend’s typescript offers the opportunity to reconsider, delve deeper into and cast a brighter light on a rather neglected aspect in the growing literature on Feyerabend’s thought: the significance of Ehrenhaft for the development of Feyerabend’s intellectual biography.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Debate On Magnetic Current: the troubled Einstein–Ehrenhaft correspondence.Gildo Magalhães Santos - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (3):371-400.
Telling Stories in Science: Feyerabend and Thought Experiments.Michael T. Stuart - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (1):262-281.
An appraisal of the controversial nature of the oil drop experiment: Is closure possible?Mansoor Niaz - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-702.
Assessing information on the quality of care for consumers.J. E. Sisk, D. M. Dougherty, P. M. Ehrenhaft, G. Ruby & B. A. Mitchner - 1990 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 27:263-72.
Reconsidering Feyerabend’s “Anarchism‘.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Farewell to Feyerabend.Harvey Siegel - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):343 – 369.
Is there "true magnetism" or not?Felix Ehrenhaft & Leo Banet - 1941 - Philosophy of Science 8 (3):458-462.
Feyerabend, Science, and Scientism.Ian James Kidd - 2021 - In Karim Bschir & Jamie Shaw (eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 172-190.
III. Yates on Feyerabend's democratic relativism.C. Fred Alford - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):113 – 118.
Thomas Kuhn on revolution and Paul Feyerabend on anarchy.Thomas J. Hickey - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):102-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-08

Downloads
30 (#535,945)

6 months
17 (#151,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Single Magnetic Northpoles and Southpoles and Their Importance for Science.Paul K. Feyerabend - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):95-117.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Three Interviews with Paul K. Feyerabend.R. Parascandalo & V. Hosle - 1995 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1995 (102):115-148.
Discussion.[author unknown] - 2008 - Theoria 21 (1):55-62.

View all 9 references / Add more references