On the Deontic Validity of the General Exclusive Norm

Phenomenology and Mind 24:248-256 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper concerns the following two questions: (i) is the general exclusive norm a proper legal norm? (ii) if the general exclusive norm is a proper legal norm, is it universally valid? It will be held that the general exclusive norm is a proper legal norm and not a logical principle. Therefore, as a legal norm, it can be said to be valid or invalid. The answer to the second question will be negative: the general exclusive norm, as a proper legal norm, is valid only in those legal systems in which it is positively established.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.17454/pam-2419

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aquinas’s lex iniusta non est lex: a Test of Legal Validity.Andre Santos Campos - 2014 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 100 (3):366-378.
Aquinas’s lex iniusta non est lex: a Test of Legal Validity.Andre Santos Campos - 2014 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 100 (3):366-378.
Problems of the Stufenbaulehre: Kelsen’s Failure to Derive the Validity of a Norm from Another Norm.András Jakab - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (1):35-68.
Charter Challenges: A Test Case For Theories of Law.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 1991 - Osgoode Hall Law Journal 29 (1):183-214.
Legal validity: An inferential analysis.Giovanni Sartor - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (2):212-247.
Legal System and Practical Reason. On the Structure of a Normative Theory of Law.Jan-Reinard Sieckmann - 1992 - Ratio Juris 5 (3):288-307.
Legal Validity: An Inferential Analysis.Giovanni Sartor - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (2):212-247.
Probleme der Stufenbaulehre.András Jakab - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):333-365.
Probleme der Stufenbaulehre Das Scheitern des Ableitungsgedankens und die Aussichten der Reinen Rechtslehre.András Jakab - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):333-365.
Norm Propositions Defended.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (3):367-373.
Four concepts of validity: Reflections on inclusive and exclusive positivism.Wil J. Waluchow - unknown
A Kantian Solution to the Problem of the Conceptual Origins of the Normativity of Law.Mario García Berger - 2020 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie 106 (2):249-264.
How deontic logic contributes to the analysis of legal systems. Review of Navarro & Rodríguez, Deontic Logic and Legal Systems.Jan Woleński - 2016 - Revus 29.
Norm Performatives and Deontic Logic.Rosja Mastop - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):83-105.
Applicability of Legal Norms.Pablo Navarro - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17 (2):337-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-22

Downloads
6 (#1,465,900)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references