Is Penal Substitution Unsatisfactory?

Philosophia Christi 21 (1):153-166 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It might be objected to penal substitutionary theories that punishing Christ could not possibly meet the demands of divine retributive justice. For punishing another person for my crimes would not serve to remove my guilt. The Anglo-American system of justice, in fact, does countenance and even endorse cases in which a substitute satisfies the demands of retributive justice. Moreover, Christ’s being divinely and voluntarily appointed to act not merely as our substitute but as our representative enables him to serve as our proxy before God, so that when he is punished, we are punished, to the satisfaction of divine justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is penal substitution unjust?William Lane Craig - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (3):231-244.
Punishing and Atoning: A New Critique of Penal Substitution.Brent G. Kyle - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):201-218.
Do we believe in penal substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment.Mark C. Murphy - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273.
The Atonement.William Lane Craig - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
The coherence of equivocal penal substitution: modern and scholastic voices.G. H. Labooy & P. M. Wisse - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 86 (3):227-241.
Trading truth for justice?Claudio Tamburrini - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):153-167.
Criminal Attempts and the Penal Lottery.Andrew C. Khoury - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (4):779-792.
Do We Believe in Consequences? Revisiting the “Incoherence Objection” to Penal Substitution.Christopher Woznicki - 2018 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 60 (2):208-228.
Original sin and atonement.Oliver D. Crisp - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-21

Downloads
79 (#212,335)

6 months
20 (#132,940)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references