- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An assessment of a formal ethics committee consultation process
HEC Forum 6 (1):18-30 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
Exploring the role of the ethics committee psychiatrist.Charles C. Engel - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (6):360-371.
Ethics consultation in united states hospitals: A national survey.Ellen Fox, Sarah Myers & Robert A. Pearlman - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):13 – 25.
The design and use of the bioethics consultation form.David J. Doukas - 1992 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (1).
Ethics Consultation and Empathy: Finding the Balance in Clinical Settings.Florian Bruns & Andreas Frewer - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (4):247-255.
Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
Ethics committee consultation: A case. [REVIEW]Glenn Tripp & Patricia I. McCotter - 1997 - HEC Forum 9 (4):389-392.
The hfea public consultation process on hybrids and chimeras: Informed, effective, and meaningful?Françoise Baylis - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 41-62.
An analysis of ethics consultation in the clinical setting.Joy D. Skeel & Donnie J. Self - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (4).
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
46 (#347,115)
6 months
7 (#437,422)
2009-01-28
Downloads
46 (#347,115)
6 months
7 (#437,422)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.Chiara Crico, Virginia Sanchini, Paolo Giovanni Casali & Gabriella Pravettoni - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (1):135-151.
Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.S. A. Hurst, A. Perrier, R. Pegoraro, S. Reiter-Theil, R. Forde, A.-M. Slowther, E. Garrett-Mayer & M. Danis - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):51-57.
Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.Ann M. Heesters, Ruby R. Shanker, Kevin Rodrigues, Daniel Z. Buchman, Andria Bianchi, Claudia Barned, Erica Nekolaichuk, Eryn Tong, Marina Salis & Jennifer A. H. Bell - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-65.
Physicians' Access to Ethics Support Services in Four European Countries.Samia A. Hurst, Stella Reiter-Theil, Arnaud Perrier, Reidun Forde, Anne-Marie Slowther, Renzo Pegoraro & Marion Danis - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (4):321-335.
Clinical ethics committees--pros and cons.R. Gillon - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):203-204.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-pqwqt uwo