Evolution and Moral Diversity

The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7:1-16 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If humans have an evolved moral psychology, then we should not expect it to function in an identical way between individuals. Instead, we should expect a diversity in the function of our moral psychology between individuals that varies along genetic lines, and a corresponding diversity of moral attitudes and moral judgements that emerge from it. This is because there was no one psychological type that would reliably produce adaptive social behaviour in the highly heterogeneous environments in which our minds evolved. As such, there was no single psychological type towards which evolution could gravitate. Instead we evolved a stable polymorphism of psychological types, maintained by frequency-dependent selection, each predisposed towards particular social and moral attitudes and behaviours. This can help explain the existence of moral diversity, particularly intra-cultural moral diversity, and seemingly intractable moral disagreement.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolution and Moral Ecology.Dean Timothy - 2014 - Dissertation, The University of New South Wales
Bioethics in the Third Millennium: Some Critical Anticipations.Hugo Tristram Engelhardt - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):225-243.
On Our Moral Fate.Kim Sterelny - 2021 - Jus Cogens 3 (1):51-58.
How good is the linguistic analogy?Susan Dwyer - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 145--167.
The Humean Approach to Moral Diversity.Mark Collier - 2013 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):41-52.
Prankster's ethics.Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):45–52.
The Advantages of Moral Diversity.Amélie Oksenberg Rorty - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):38.
Moral Diversity and Moral Education.Michael S. Pritchard - 1994 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 15 (2).
Being a realist about relativism (in ethics).Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):155-176.
The Progress of Moral Evolution.Tim Lewens - 2019 - Analyse & Kritik 41 (2):259-270.
The diversity of moral thinking.Neil Cooper - 1981 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-05

Downloads
125 (#146,490)

6 months
74 (#67,293)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Dean
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Our responsibility to manage evaluative diversity.Christopher Santos-Lang - 2014 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 44 (2):16-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ethical project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature.Peter Godfrey-Smith (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Framework for the Psychology of Norms.Chandra Sripada & Stephen Stich - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind, Volume 2: Culture and Cognition. , US: Oxford University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references