- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
13. on the characterization of the weak-strong distinction1
In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 421 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Weak and global supervenience are strong.Mark Moyer - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (1):125 - 150.
Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations：A Comment on Kim’s Theory of Supervenience.Xiaoping Chen - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):316-333.
Pareto principles, positive responsiveness, and majority decisions.Susumu Cato - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (4):503-518.
Strong versus weak quantum consequence operations.Jacek Malinowski - 1992 - Studia Logica 51 (1):113 - 123.
Perelman’s Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme.Manfred Kraus - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):362-382.
Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations.Youngeun Yoon - 1996 - Natural Language Semantics 4 (3):217-236.
Weak supervenience and materialism.William E. Seager - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (June):697-709.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-31
Downloads
8 (#1,323,248)
6 months
3 (#984,114)
2014-01-31
Downloads
8 (#1,323,248)
6 months
3 (#984,114)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Pluractionality and Complex Quantifier Formation.Malte Zimmermann - 2003 - Natural Language Semantics 11 (3):249-287.
A large-scale investigation of scalar implicature.Petra Hendriks, John Hoeks, Helen de Hoop, Irene Krämer, Erik-Jan Smits, Jennifer Spenader & Henriëtte de Swart - 2009 - In Uli Sauerland & Kazuko Yatsushiro (eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: from experiment to theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Quantification in natural languages (volumes I & II), E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B.h. Partee, eds.Jaap van der Does & Henk Verkuyl - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (2):243-251.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-9vkzx uwo