On the Relative Intrusiveness of Physical and Chemical Restraints

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):26-28 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Crutchfield and Redinger argue that consciousness-altering chemical restraints are less “liberty-intrusive” (or as we will sometimes put it, just less “intrusive”) than physical restraints. Physica...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):3-16.
Chemical Restraints and the Basic Liberties.David Birks - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):22-24.
The Limitations of Principlism.Jed P. Mangal & Nathan S. Scheiner - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):17-19.
Exercising restraint: autonomy, welfare and elderly patients.S. Dodds - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (3):160-163.
Was Duhem Justified in not Distinguishing Between Physical and Chemical Atomism?Needham Paul - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:108.
Moral Individualism: Agent-Relativity and Deontic Restraints.Eric Mack - 1989 - Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (1):81.
Restraint Use And Autonomy In Psychiatric Care.C. Herrera - 2007 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2:1-4.
Restraint Use and Autonomy in Psychiatric Care.C. D. Herrera - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 1 (1):4.
The Ground Between the Gaps.Jonathan Schaffer - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-13

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
12 (#220,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gabriel De Marco
University of Oxford
Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford
Lisa Forsberg
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Basic Liberties, Consent, and Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):3-16.
Direct Versus Indirect: Control, Moral Responsibility, and Free Action.Alfred R. Mele - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (3):559-573.
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action.Gabriel De Marco - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):1953-1972.
Direct control.Alfred R. Mele - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):275-290.

Add more references