E pluribus unum?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):617-618 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

W&S correctly ask if groups can be like individuals in the harmony and cooperation of their parts, but in their answer, they ignore the importance of the difference between genetically related and unrelated components, and also misconstrue the import of the Hutterites.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

E pluribus unum: Plural logic and set theory.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophia Mathematica 12 (3):193-221.
Scotus’s Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2.Cruz González-Ayesta - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
A REJOINDER: “unum post aliud”.J. Fang - 1989 - Philosophia Mathematica (2):236-245.
Thomas Aquinas on the Ontology of Amicitia.Yoshihisa Yamamoto - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:251-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#265,446)

6 months
27 (#111,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel C. Dennett
Tufts University

Citations of this work

The return of the group.Kim Sterelny - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (4):562-584.
Explaining human altruism.Michael Vlerick - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):2395-2413.

Add more citations