The Selfish Gene as a Philosophical Essay

Abstract

One critic complained that my argument was ‘philosophical’, as though that was sufficient condemnation. Philosophical or not, the fact is that neither he nor anybody else has found any flaw in what I said. And ‘in principle’ arguments such as mine, far from being irrelevant to the real world, can be more powerful than arguments based on particular factual research. My reasoning, if it is correct, tells us something important about life everywhere in the universe. Laboratory and field research can tell us only about life as we have sampled it here. (The Selfish Gene (second edn, p322 in endnotes)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Unnatural selection.James Miles - 1998 - Philosophy 73 (4):593-608.
What is the Gene Trying to Do?Warren J. Ewens - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):155-176.
Genes: Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test.Karola Stotz & Paul Griffiths - 2004 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):5-28.
Unselfishness.Christopher G. Framarin - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):69-83.
Selfish Genes and Social Darwinism.Mary Midgley - 1983 - Philosophy 58 (225):365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
230 (#88,700)

6 months
10 (#276,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel C. Dennett
Tufts University

Citations of this work

Better to be a Pig Dissatisfied than a Plant Satisfied.Ethan C. Terrill & Walter Veit - 2024 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 37 (4):1-17.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references