Responses/Correspondence

Women’s Philosophy Review 11:11-19 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justifications for Gender Quotas in Legislative Bodies.Meena Dhanda - 1998 - Women’s Philosophy Review 20:44-61.
Theorising with a Practical Intent.Meena Dhanda & Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Women’s Philosophy Review 26:6-27.
On Roman Catholic Political Philosophy.James V. Schall - 2015 - Catholic Social Science Review 20:173-181.
Whose Knowledge? Whose Post-Modernism?Anne Seller - 1994 - Women’s Philosophy Review 11:41-53.
Care, Gender and Justice. [REVIEW]Anne Seller - 1996 - Women’s Philosophy Review 15:17-18.
How to Read Hannah? [REVIEW]Anne Seller - 1994 - Women’s Philosophy Review 12:19-22.
Views.Janna Thompson & Anne Seller - 1994 - Women’s Philosophy Review 11:8-10.
The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. [REVIEW]Anne Seller - 1999 - Women’s Philosophy Review 21:73-76.
What Should a Correspondence Theory Be and Do?Patricia Marino - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (3):415-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-19

Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Meena Dhanda
University of Wolverhampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references