Contingency in Nature

Axiomathes 20 (2-3):269-277 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contingencies in Nature may be explained, but such explanations refer to other contingencies (pt. I). Is there a way to “explain away” all contingencies? The first physical theory of modern times, Newton’s theory of gravitation, was received in a way that leaves this question open (pt. II), while Kepler’s theory of cosmological harmony arrived at a positive solution (pt. III). However, later developments in science outdated Kepler’s approach (pt. IV).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-09

Downloads
64 (#255,103)

6 months
10 (#280,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of Science in Germany, 1992–2012: Survey-Based Overview and Quantitative Analysis.Matthias Unterhuber, Alexander Gebharter & Gerhard Schurz - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):71-160.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The genesis of the concept of physical law.Edgar Zilsel - 1942 - Philosophical Review 51 (3):245-279.
Kepler¿s Harmonice Mundi: Dead end road or final theory?Werner Diederich - 2001 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 36 (78):7-18.

Add more references