Post-mortem Reproduction from a Vietnamese Perspective—an Analysis and Commentary

Asian Bioethics Review 12 (3):257–288 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Post-mortem reproduction is a complex and contested matter attracting attention from a diverse group of scholars and resulting in various responses from a range of countries. Vietnam has been reluctant to deal directly with this matter and has, accordingly, permitted post-mortem reproduction implicitly. First, by analysing Vietnam’s post-mortem reproduction cases, this paper reflects on the manner in which Vietnamese authorities have handled each case in the context of the contemporary legal framework, and it reveals the moral questions arising therefrom. The article then offers an account of Vietnamese social norms as an explanation for the tendency to conduct post-mortem reproduction. In arguing that a deeper and more thorough examination of the moral and ethical reasoning is required, the paper advocates in favour of supportive post-mortem reproduction regulation. In doing so, the paper seeks to reconcile the Vietnamese legal framework and post-mortem reproduction experiences of other countries. The article concludes that Vietnam and countries sharing the similar cultural traits should permit post-mortem reproduction explicitly. This would require full engagement with the ethical and legal issues arising, and careful promulgation of regulations and guidelines based on comparative experiences of a range of countries in handling this matter.

Similar books and articles

Management of Post-Mortem Pregnancy: Legal and Philosophical Aspects.Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):37-37.
Past Desires and the Dead.Steven Luper - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (3):331-345.
Post-mortem privacy and informational self-determination.J. C. Buitelaar - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (2):129-142.
Scotus on the Metaphysics of Habits.Marilyn McCord Adams - 2014 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 88:71-83.
Posthumous Harm.Steven Luper - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-11

Downloads
1,123 (#11,484)

6 months
444 (#3,823)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Enacting Bioethics.Graeme T. Laurie - 2020 - Asian Bioethics Review 12 (3):253-255.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Grundlegung zur metaphysik der sitten.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - Gotha,: L. Klotz. Edited by Rudolf Otto.
Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.Immanuel Kant & Karl Vorländer - 1908 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 65:217-217.
Kantian pluralism.Thomas E. Hill Jr - 1992 - Ethics 102 (4):743-762.

View all 14 references / Add more references