Re-viewing the Sexual Relation: Levinas and Film

Film-Philosophy 11 (2):49-65 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When considering possible theoretical perspectives for an ethical conceptualisation oferotic or sexually explicit display in cinema, such as recent controversial work by Frenchfemale directors Catherine Breillat and Claire Denis, the thought of Emmanuel Levinas isperhaps not the most likely or obvious candidate. Levinas has little to say directly aboutsexuality or pornography, even though the concepts of desire and Eros are central tomuch of his philosophy.1Equally, he is notoriously suspicious of figurality and the realmof the visual, a suspicion he voices especially forcefully in his essay on the work of art‘Reality and its Shadow’ . It is,paradoxically, and perhaps perversely, for this very reason that this article will considerhim as potentially the theorist par excellence for viewing sexual images in cinema

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Film and ethics: foreclosed encounters.Lisa Downing - 2010 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Libby Saxton.
Sex, Dialectics and the Misery of Happiness.Greg Tuck - 2011 - Film-Philosophy 15 (1):33-62.
On escape =.Emmanuel Lévinas (ed.) - 2003 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Questions to Luce Irigaray.Kate Ince - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
62 (#262,361)

6 months
16 (#163,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references