Epistemic Operators

In Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Skepticism: a contemporary reader. New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.
Belief fusion and revision: an overview based on epistemic logic semantics.Churn-Jung Liau - 2004 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14 (3):247-274.
Epistemic Operators in Dependence Logic.Pietro Galliani - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):367-397.
Probability Operators.Seth Yalcin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (11):916-37.
Epistemic operators.Fred I. Dretske - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (24):1007-1023.
Index, context, and the content of knowledge.Brian Rabern - 2017 - In Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. Routledge. pp. 465-479.
Free choice of alternatives.Anamaria Fălăuş - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (2):121-173.
Completing pseudojump operators.R. Coles, R. Downey, C. Jockusch & G. LaForte - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 136 (3):297-333.
Expressivity and completeness for public update logics via reduction axioms.Barteld Kooi - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):231-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-25

Downloads
2 (#1,814,705)

6 months
1 (#1,507,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Dretske
Last affiliation: Duke University

Citations of this work

Elusive knowledge.David Lewis - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549 – 567.
Questions in Action.Daniel Hoek - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy 119 (3):113-143.
Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology.Annalisa Coliva - 2015 - London, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.
What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.

View all 340 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references