10 How Heidegger defends the possibility of a correspondence theory of truth with respect to the entities of natural science

In Hubert L. Dreyfus & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.), Heidegger Reexamined. Routledge. pp. 4--219 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When empirical success implies theoretical reference: A structural correspondence theorem.Gerhard Schurz - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):101-133.
The fragility of robust realism: A reply to Dreyfus and Spinosa.Jeff Malpas - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):89 – 101.
Must Metaethical Realism Make a Semantic Claim?Guy Kahane - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):148-178.
Robust Intelligibility: Response to Our Critics.Charles Spinosa & Hubert L. Dreyfus - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):177-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#172,459)

6 months
4 (#799,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hubert Dreyfus
Last affiliation: University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

The Poetic Experience of the World.Mathew Abbott - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (4):493-516.
Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger.Jeff Kochan - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (1):81-115.
Heidegger’s Relative Essentialism.Timothy J. Nulty - 2022 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 53 (1):40-60.
Two Accounts of the Hermeneutic Fore-structure of Scientific Research.Dimitri Ginev - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):423-445.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references